In the wildlife photography community there is an ongoing,
and sometimes bitter, controversy about whether or not one should reveal the
location of wildlife. Like many areas
where personal opinion dictates behavior, sharing information is multifaceted
and there is no “one size fits all” rule.
Many of my wildlife photo opportunities happen along a
small, sparsely populated, country road.
The folks who live there value their privacy and the ability walk alone, in safety, without dodging traffic. Because I
respect their choices and lifestyle, I only reveal this location to those whom
I know will also respect them...
Often photo opportunities occur in public places with a great
deal of human activity. One such place is “River Bend Park” not far from the
city of Frederick. It so happens that
this park provides attractive habitat for many species of birds, barred owls
and great horned owls in particular. For the most part owls are nocturnal
hunters and not often seen during daylight hours. This makes them especially attractive to
birders and photographers.
Some in the wildlife photography and birding community believe
that revealing the presence of the owls will encourage too much human activity
which may “disturb” the owls. I find
this argument lacking merit when the owls choose to live and nest in a
place that has daily walkers, joggers, bicyclists, etc. all day long...
Photographers encounter this attitude in national parks
regularly. Animosity arises among those
who do not wish to share wildlife locations towards others who do, especially
when the information is shared on social media.
I believe there are many reasons for these differing opinions. The one that I find most distasteful is that
many photographers are selfish and do not wish to share photo opportunities
with others. They may feel that the value
of their photos will be diminished if others take similar photographs...
Another reason often given for not sharing information is
that the animal will be habituated to humans.
This argument is equally without merit when one considers that wildlife
in national and state parks are around people from the time of their birth. If wildlife were in any manner disturbed,
stressed, or otherwise uncomfortable with the presence of humans they need
simply to walk a few yards into the forest to escape the intrusion.
I feel that sharing wildlife with others is likely to be
beneficial to the animals. The more
people are able to see and photograph wild creatures the greater the likely hood
that humans will want to understand and protect the wildlife and their habitat. From personal experience I can say that
having wildlife locations shared with us has enriched our visits to Yellowstone
and Grand Teton National Parks. Even
when the information is not shared directly, it is hard to keep a location
secret when there is a mob of photographers with tripods and long lenses gathered
on the side of the road.
Ultimately, it is up to each individual whether to share a
location or not. Bear in mind that we
are all there for the same reason and being civil to each other will enhance
the experience for all of us.
Thanks for visiting, be well, and come back soon.
I agree. If a screech owl chooses to perch in a sycamore next to the Great Falls Visitors Center, it is obviously not bothered by people. Besides, they are usually perched high enough that photography cannot really disturb them. Barred owls seem to be equally unfazed by photographers on the C&O Canal and approaching them is not really possible anyway since it is hard to take a picture underneath a bird! or even get there.
ReplyDelete